To see or post comments, click on the blog post title to be "in" the post.
Showing posts with label agents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label agents. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Agents: Gatekeepers or Champions?
Agents always get a bad rap when it comes to writers, especially those of us who’ve suffered through a butt load of rejections. Agents are too picky…They only want bestsellers…they’re only out for money…
And, well, it’s more than likely true. It IS their JOB after all. They only make money when their author’s make money, so it pays to be picky who they pick up, and if the author turns out to be a bestseller, even better! But there’s no guarantee that the book an agent signs will sell, let only become a bestseller, so…yeah…not really a valid argument to not have an agent…
Anyway, that’s not really why I decided to write a post.
It’s actually because of this. I’m not going to go into details, but if you read the post, you’ll get an eyeful.
The reason I’m writing, is that this is a classic example why getting an agent or having a literary attorney look over your contract before you sign it is a good idea.
Agents are more than gatekeepers. They’re your champion. They’ll make sure your book finds the perfect home. Which publishers are looking for your kind of book, which editors you’ll work well with, and what publishers to avoid. They’ll negotiate a contract that’s in YOUR best interest and if the worst happens and something happens with your publisher, they’ll help you figure a way out of the mess. They’ve “got your back” so to speak. Because they want you, generally, for your entire career. Again that whole if-you-don’t-make-money-neither-do-they thing.
If you absolutely don’t want an agent, you absolutely NEED to hire a literary attorney to look over those contracts. Just because a “publisher” claims their contract is author friendly, doesn’t mean it is. In fact, it may be downright predatory. And a literary attorney is going to be able to spot the nuances that a normal contracts attorney isn’t going to be able to see.
Now, I’m not saying the most commercial publishers are bad. If you’ve done your research, then chances are you’re not going to run into a vanity press in disguise, but there are enough scam publishers out there, that you really need to be careful.
So, in my opinion, it’s just easier to find an agent who will walk with you through every step of the process. Who will listen to your gripes, help you brainstorm new book ideas and generally help guide your career down the path you want to take.
Labels:
agents,
gatekeepers,
literary attorneys
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
To Nudge or Not to Nudge. That is the question.
Okay my fine friends, just a quick post today. I’ve been getting a lot of questions lately about response times and when to nudge. I guess they figure I should know since I made it through the gauntlet of agents. LOL. Yeah. Uh. Hate to tell you this, but…all agents are different. ;)
However, I can give you a few pointers. The worst time to query in regards to response times is the summer. Now I’m not suggesting to not send just before or during the summer months, I’m just letting you know to not expect a response until well after school starts. And then they'll still move in order of "first come, first serve."
If you sent a query in May, the time to START looking for a response is late September to early October. For a partial or full, start looking around mid- to late October.
For the rest of the year, here’s a pretty good timetable (obviously these only reply to agents/agencies that don’t have a no response=no policy):
Query only: 4-8 weeks. It’s okay to nudge after this time has passed. Then once more after another month has passed. If they still don’t respond they are probably not interested.
Partial: 3 months minimum. Follow the same pattern as above, but I’d say you should be able to status query a total of 3 times. It is a partial after all. Unless, of course, that partial was a part of that initial query stage.
Full: 6 months minimum with the same status query pattern. Once a month after the initial nudge for a total of 3 nudges.
Obviously, this was just my pattern and something else may work better for you, but you don’t want to go overboard and look like you’re a prima donna or high maintenance, so status query with discretion.
Also, I would think it okay to nudge once on a no response=no agent/agency. Sometimes things happen and things get lost in the transit. So I always suggest getting a confirmation from the post office for snail mail.
Join me tomorrow where I’ll talk about how to send that requested full/partial.
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
To Nudge or Not to Nudge. That is the question.
2010-08-25T10:10:00-04:00
J.A. Souders
agents|nudging|writing advice|
Comments

Labels:
agents,
nudging,
writing advice
Thursday, July 1, 2010
July's Secret Agent Contest
It's that time again! Time for another secret agent contest. Pay close attention because the rules have changed slightly and can be found here.
For this contest I will only be accepting submissions for kid lit. That means any genre of Young adult, Mid-grade, and Chapter books.
The contest is open from NOW! until either I get 25 entries or until Monday at 0800 EST. Results will be given no later than August 1.
While this contest is only open to those with a finished manuscript, anyone who wishes to offer critiques on the query and/or first 250 words may and would be strongly appreciated.
Good luck to all those who enter!
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Thursday, July 01, 2010
July's Secret Agent Contest
2010-07-01T10:02:00-04:00
J.A. Souders
agents|contest|critiques|Feedback|Query letters|Secret Agent|
Comments

Labels:
agents,
contest,
critiques,
Feedback,
Query letters,
Secret Agent
Friday, April 23, 2010
The Query: Putting it all together
Just a quick post today. Here's what my query letter looked like all put together when I sent it to my agent.
Dear Natalie Fischer: (SALUTATION: REMEMBER TO PERSONALIZE THIS HERE. DO NOT MASS EMAIL. SEND TO ONE AGENT AT A TIME!!)
You'd think imagining a handsome stranger in your rearview mirror, crashing through a guardrail, careening into murky waters, and then being rescued by the same imaginary boy--who gives his name as Jackson--would be bad enough. But for seventeen-year-old Lily Baker, that’s just the start of her problems. (HOOK: GRAB THE READERS ATTENTION)
After coming home from the hospital, Jackson starts showing up in reflective surfaces — mirrors, puddles, windows, you name it. Lily, fearing others will think she’s crazy, keeps the visions to herself. After all, they’ll just go away if she ignores them, right? Not if Jackson has anything to say about it. And it isn’t long before he convinces her he’s real. The more time she spends staring into her mirror, the more she realizes she’s falling in love with a boy her family and friends insist is nothing more than shadows in her mirror and the hallucinations of her healing head injury. (SYNOPSIS: EXPLAIN ENOUGH OF THE BOOK TO GET THEIR INTEREST. END ON A HOOK)
MIRROR IMAGE is a science fiction romantic young adult novel, complete at 83,000 words. With a mix of Alice In Wonderland, The Phantom of the Opera, and Romeo & Juliet, this is a story of love that knows no bounds. Time, space, even the very fabric of reality cannot stop it. (BOOK DETAILS)
My young adult book, under the working title FALLEN, has been offered a contract from XXX. We are currently undergoing negotiations. I am a member of the RWA and CFRW. (PERSONAL BIO)
(PERSONALIZATION WOULD NORMALLY GO HERE)
Per your guidelines, I have enclosed a synopsis and the first 50 pages. Thank you for your generous time. I look forward to hearing from you soon. (TELL THEM WHAT YOU ARE INCLUDING AND THANK THEM FOR THEIR TIME.)
Sincerely,
(MAKE SURE TO INCLUDE YOUR NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION.)
As you can see, it’s pretty easy. Mostly. :D
Here’s some fantaboulous resources to help you.
And my own agent’s template.
I’ll add more agent’s onto this as I find them, so check back throughout the day.
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Friday, April 23, 2010
The Query: Putting it all together
2010-04-23T08:30:00-04:00
J.A. Souders
agent query|agents|Feedback|Mirror Image|Natalie Fischer|Query letters|road to publication|Rules|tips|writing|writing advice|
Comments

Labels:
agent query,
agents,
Feedback,
Mirror Image,
Natalie Fischer,
Query letters,
road to publication,
Rules,
tips,
writing,
writing advice
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
They Query: Part 3-Deets and Personalization
Welcome back! This is #3 in my query “workshop.” As always, remember what worked for me, may not work for you as all agents are different and want different things. ALWAYS read the agents/editors guidelines for their recommendations. Today we’re going to focus on the ms details section and personalizing your letter.
When I’m talking about the details, this is the nitty gritty section that lets the agent/editor know how long, what genre, and who your target audience for your book is. I try to spice up this section a little so it’s not boring. We still want to keep the readers attention here.
Also, you want to make sure your title is in all caps.
Here’s an example of the one I used for Mirror Image:
MIRROR IMAGE is a science fiction romantic young adult novel, complete at 83,000 words. With a mix of Alice In Wonderland, The Phantom of the Opera, and Romeo & Juliet, this is a story of love that knows no bounds. Time, space, even the very fabric of reality cannot stop it.
Now there is some speculation on whether or not you should actually say the work is a mix of blah and blah, but it worked well for me. It has been said that it’s better to say that the book will appeal to readers of blah and blah instead. I’ll leave that up to you.
As I look as this, I realize I’ve come close to doing one of the no no’s in the industry. You NEVER want to refer to your book as a “fiction novel.” It’s redundant. If it’s fiction, then yes it’s a novel. If I were still querying, I would try to reword that first sentence to make it better, but as they say, “hindsight is twenty-twenty.”
Now onto personalization. If at all possible, thoroughly research the agents you want to submit to, then, and only then, submit to them. With the research you’ve obtained you want to add one or two sentences to your query so they know you’ve done your research.
Unfortunately, I couldn’t find enough information on my agent (at the time) to really personalize it, but here’s an example of something you could do.
Since you represent such and such author’s book, TITLE HERE, which is similar to mine, for these reasons (list 1 or 2 reasons), I hope you’ll agree my book is a good fit for your list.
There are, of course, other ways to do it. For instance, reading their guidelines and mentioning that since they are looking for such and such book, you think that YOUR BOOK would be a good fit.
Or you read in such and such interview that they were looking for, or they said something.
The potential here is limitless and, if you do your research, this should be the easiest part of the query.
Tomorrow, will be on your bio and the closing of the letter. Until then, Ciao!
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
They Query: Part 3-Deets and Personalization
2010-04-21T10:20:00-04:00
J.A. Souders
agent query|agents|contest|querying|road to publication|Rules|Secret Agent|tips|writing advice|
Comments

Labels:
agent query,
agents,
contest,
querying,
road to publication,
Rules,
Secret Agent,
tips,
writing advice
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Query letters-Part 2: The Synopsis
Hello and welcome back for another installment on my query letter writing “workshop.” Please remember that all agents are different and what works for me, may not work for you!
So, now onto the next part of your letter. They synopsis. So you’ve drawn in the agent with your hook and they want to keep reading and find out what’s going on with your book.
This is the most difficult part of the letter for me. Because you want to give the agent enough to realize what the plot is, but not so much you give it all away. Basically, you want to have a back of the book blurb here. You also want to end this on a hook. And in this particular synopsis you don’t want to give the ending away. Make it sweet and simple, yet fascinating.
Grab the agent’s attention and make them want to read the pages you’ve included or make them want to request them if they only have the query.
However, avoid using rhetorical questions. Agents tend to frown on it.
Most people say the synopsis should be no more than a paragraph, but it’s probably okay to have two if you absolutely need it. Try for one though, if you can. Remember there’s still more you need to include in letter besides the book stuff, and you only get a page to do it.
Here’s an example of the synopsis I used for Mirror Image:
After coming home from the hospital, Jackson starts showing up in reflective surfaces — mirrors, puddles, windows, you name it. Lily, fearing others will think she’s crazy, keeps the visions to herself. After all, they’ll just go away if she ignores them, right? Not if Jackson has anything to say about it. And it isn’t long before he convinces her he’s real. The more time she spends staring into her mirror, the more she realizes she’s falling in love with a boy her family and friends insist is nothing more than shadows in her mirror and the hallucinations of her healing head injury.
As you can see that even though my story is written in first person, past tense, the synopsis needs to be in third person, present tense. Always. I can’t think of any exception to that rule.
Also, note there’s a lot of my character’s voice in this. Lily is funny and a smart alec, but she has a romantic side, too. Not to mention a bit of stubbornness. If I’ve done this part right, you can see all this.
This is what you strive for. You want to SHOW the agent what your book is about. If it’s a comedy don’t just say it’s funny. Show that in your letter.
Okay, tomorrow, the details about your manuscript and personalization.
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Query letters-Part 2: The Synopsis
2010-04-20T10:19:00-04:00
J.A. Souders
agent query|agents|contest|Query letters|querying|Secret Agent|tips|writing advice|
Comments

Labels:
agent query,
agents,
contest,
Query letters,
querying,
Secret Agent,
tips,
writing advice
Friday, April 16, 2010
Secret Agent Contest
Okay, so here's how it's going to work.
There will be a call for submissions. When the call comes, follow the guidelines carefully and submit before the deadline. All submissions will then be posted (anonymously) on the blog, and all readers are invited to leave critiques/feedback. Everyone who has entered the contest is expected to crit a minimum of five entries (and I'm not talking about "Oh this is good, I really like it." The biggest point of this contest is for the critiques. Get as detailed with them as possible. If it's good and you can't see a way to make it better, don't comment. Just go onto another that you can help with. However, IF you really like it, write a comment telling me you'd like to see this query + first 250 move onto the next round).
Our Secret Agent may or may not join the panel of critters (that is, you) and leave feedback for entries (through me). Then I will narrow down the list to the best twenty-five entries(using a number of factors, including your "votes"). When the contest has ended, the Secret Agent will choose a winner.
That's it in a nutshell!
Here are the basic guidelines for each Secret Agent contest:
- PRIZES:
- First place: Critique of Full Manuscript
- Second Place: Critique of the first 50 pages
There will be a call for submissions. When the call comes, follow the guidelines carefully and submit before the deadline. All submissions will then be posted (anonymously) on the blog, and all readers are invited to leave critiques/feedback. Everyone who has entered the contest is expected to crit a minimum of five entries (and I'm not talking about "Oh this is good, I really like it." The biggest point of this contest is for the critiques. Get as detailed with them as possible. If it's good and you can't see a way to make it better, don't comment. Just go onto another that you can help with. However, IF you really like it, write a comment telling me you'd like to see this query + first 250 move onto the next round).
Our Secret Agent may or may not join the panel of critters (that is, you) and leave feedback for entries (through me). Then I will narrow down the list to the best twenty-five entries(using a number of factors, including your "votes"). When the contest has ended, the Secret Agent will choose a winner.
That's it in a nutshell!
Here are the basic guidelines for each Secret Agent contest:
- All excerpts submitted to the Secret Agent contest must be a query letter (no more than a page long) and the first 250 words of your COMPLETED manuscript.(VERY IMPORTANT! The manuscript MUST be completed.)
- Your submission must include your screen name and the title, genre, and word count of your novel.
- By emailing your submission to me, you are giving implicit permission to have your work posted and publicly critiqued.
- No submissions will be accepted prior to the opening of the contest. The maximum number of entries per contest is 25 submissions.
- Winners of previous contests may not submit the same manuscript in future contests.
- All contest entrants are required to critique a minimum of five other entries.
- NO ATTACHMENTS are accepted. Your query and 250 submission must be pasted into the body of your email
- Make the subject of your email Secret Agent Contest
- You will receive a confirmation email. (It may not be right away, but if you've made it into the first 25, you will get an email stating I received it and what number you were.)
- I will not make changes to your query or first 250 after you've sent it, so please make sure it's the best it can be before you send it.
- Address the agent as Secret agent.
- Put your query first, separate using the stars (***) and then place your first 250.
- Email address is secretagentcontest@gmail.com
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Friday, April 16, 2010
Secret Agent Contest
2010-04-16T08:00:00-04:00
J.A. Souders
agents|contest|critiques|Novel|Secret Agent|
Comments

Labels:
agents,
contest,
critiques,
Novel,
Secret Agent
Monday, March 1, 2010
The Number One Rule to Avoid Being Scammed in Publishing
Okay guys, I’ve been focusing so much on the legitimate side of publishing that I haven’t focused on the other side. And part of this reason is because it’s heartbreaking to me. But in the past few days I’ve had a ton of questions about publishing and how I found my agent, what the aspiring author should do, etc. and I felt it was time to talk about it.
The biggest thing in publishing is this, an author should NEVER (note the bold, italicized capitalized lettering) pay for anything to do with publishing. How real publishing works is this: You submit your manuscript to an agent/editor and then they decide whether to accept it or not.
Now here’s where it gets a little bit tricky. Let’s go down the path I went first. The agent route. Okay, so you’ve submitted to Ms. Dream Agent and she responds with a yes. She sends you her agency agreement; you hash out a few logistics and then you both sign it. Then she offers editing advice, you fix the manuscript and then she takes over and starts submitting to editors at different publishing houses.
An editor comes back and makes an offer on your book and then (after many, many things) it gets published. They send you your advance and royalty check to your agent, who takes her 15% and sends you the rest.
Going to an editor first is the same as above, minus the agent.
Notice that the only time I mentioned money was when I talked about getting an advance and/or a royalty check. That’s the only time money should EVER exchange hands. Also note in which direction it’s going. Money ALWAYS flows to the author.
Here’s things you should know about money:
The publisher:
1) Buys your book. That’s why they offer an advance. (NOTE: Some of the smaller publishers do not offer an advance, but sometimes they offer better royalties. That doesn’t make them bad. Unless they want you to pay for something.)
2) They pay for everything that goes into your book (ie cover art, editing, marketing, etc.)
3) Will NOT ask you to buy your own books. Most publishers will give you a few “author copies” (this can vary from 1—at small presses—to 50—at the big boys).
The agent:
1) Does not get paid until you do. That means that they won’t ask for a reading fee or any such garbage. They collect their percentage (usually 15% for domestic sales and 20% for foreign) and that’s it. This is the biggest reason that agents are so picky about what they pick up. NOTE: Sometimes they will ask for basic expenses( i.e. photocopying, postage, etc. But this is usually very small—less than $250--since most things are done electronically these days and it’s usually taken out of your royalty and/or advance checks.
2) Work for you. It’s better if it’s a partnership since you’re both after the same thing, but in essence they are offering a service to you. Much the same as a plumber or electrician.
So now you’re asking me, what are the big red flags to help me avoid being taken advantage of? Well, the biggest ones are to not pay a red cent. If they want you to pay ANYTHING up front, run. Run as far and as fast as you can.
Second, do your research. Go to Absolute Write’s Bewares and Background checks; do a search on anyone your planning on submitting to(yes I know I ended in a preposition J). Read what other’s have said and heed their advice.
Even if an agent/editor is “new” they should have a publishing “footprint,” which means you should be able to find them somewhere. They need to have experience somewhere. For instance, a new agent should have either done an internship with an established agency and/or have been an editor for a publishing house.
Editors should have a few years interning or working for a house, so they know how it works and what makes a great book work.
Check out Writer’s Beware. This is an awesome site that is dedicated to helping aspiring writers educate themselves on how to not be part of a scam. They list all the bad publishers and agents/agencies. Don't forget to check out their blog.
Go to Editors and Preditors- they also keep an extensive list of agents and publishers with recommendations or warnings.
You can also contact either of these websites for more detailed info on a particular person, if you so wish.
Now the reason I’m specifically posting this today is because of this “publisher.” Publish America. They say they are a “traditional” publisher, which in fact they are not. They have scammed over 40,000 aspiring authors and the numbers keep climbing. Please do NOT be one of them. I will go more into another post on Wednesday about why to avoid this "publisher" specifically, but in the meantime, please check out Janet Reid’s blog on their latest “deal.” And don’t forget to check out the other resources I listed so you can learn how to avoid being scammed.
Until next time…
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Monday, March 01, 2010
The Number One Rule to Avoid Being Scammed in Publishing
2010-03-01T12:46:00-05:00
J.A. Souders
absolute write|agents|editor and preditors|editors|fee charging agents|Janet Reid|publish america|Publishing|Rules|scam|tips|Writer's beware|writing advice|
Comments

Labels:
absolute write,
agents,
editor and preditors,
editors,
fee charging agents,
Janet Reid,
publish america,
Publishing,
Rules,
scam,
tips,
Writer's beware,
writing advice
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Professional editing: Is it worth it?
(photos courtesy of inmagine.com)
Sorry about my delay in writing a blog post for almost a week. My cold darn near killed me. LOL. And then my rewrite of THE EXILED sucked me in. J So, my last big blog was on the benefits of self-editing, which despite this post I’m a major proponent of. If you can’t edit yourself, hiring an editor will probably do you no good.
So, you’ve written your story and done everything you can to self edit and you’ve enlisted critique partners and beta readers, but you still think it needs work. Well, one option is you can hire an editor.
Now the up side of this: It’s sure to make your book practically ready to publish. The down side: It’s expensive and doesn’t really help you if you don’t learn anything from it.
Okay, so let’s talk about the up side. Being professionally edited can teach you a ton of things. If you pay attention. You’ll learn how to beef things up, or tighten them. You’ll learn the correct place for a semicolon or an exclamation point. And they’ll make sure you don’t have any inconsistencies or plot holes. They’ll help make sure that what you’re trying to say is said. Among many other things that I just don’t know about.
Most of the editors either worked for or still work for the big publishers, so they know the current trends and can help steer your book in the right direction or let you know what book you should write instead.
For the first time writer, it may very well be a good idea, so you can learn from it.
On the other hand, it’s expensive and for a full size novel ranging at around 85,000 words, it can cost $1,000 or more. So, not usually in the first time writer’s budget, especially when you can attend classes and conferences and learn the same thing for less. And when you become published your agent and/or editor at the publishing house will do the same things as the paid editor.
Will it help you find that agent? The reality is, probably not. It’s the story they want. Sure, they want it as good as possible, but most if not all agents are willing to spend a little editing time to make it perfect. So, even if it’s not all the way, if they fall in love with the story they’ll still take you on. If they don’t love it. It doesn’t matter how well it’s written, they won’t pick it up.
And on that same topic, most aren’t impressed with hiring professional editors. They want to know the author can self-edit. They want to know the writing is the author’s not just the collective efforts of paid editors. Will it prevent you from getting an agent? Probably not, but neither will it assure you that you will.
And if you want to go the small house route with publishing, you have another question to worry about. Is your book going to make enough for you that it’s worth spending the money on? It’s possible. I won’t say it isn’t, but these are things you need to consider.
And as all things in publishing, it’s a personal choice. A friend of mine has done it and is happy with the results. Another friend isn’t.
I’m not for or against professional editing. I know it isn’t for me. Maybe I’ll change my mind one day, but for the moment I’m quite happy with my beta readers and critique partner.
What’s your opinion? Are you for or against professional editing? And tell me your reasons?
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Professional editing: Is it worth it?
2010-02-11T11:59:00-05:00
J.A. Souders
agents|beta reads|books|critique partners|professional editing|Publishing|querying|Self-editing|tips|writing advice|
Comments

Labels:
agents,
beta reads,
books,
critique partners,
professional editing,
Publishing,
querying,
Self-editing,
tips,
writing advice
Thursday, January 21, 2010
The Truth about Feedback
Today’s topic is feedback and how to deal with it. We all have to do it at some point. Whether it’s from a critique partner, beta and gamma readers, agents, editors, or fans. And as my husband so crassly put it: “Opinions are like butt holes. Everybody has one.”
While it may be crass, it is most certainly true. You take thirty people on the street and ask them their opinion on something you’ll get thirty different answers. Unless, of course you ask a group of people, then some will agree with each other, just to fit in with the crowd. But, for the most part, everyone has different tastes.
So onto the topic. You’ve finished your novel and you know how important it is to get other people to read it, so you’ve sent it off to friends and family, a few beta readers, and your critique group who’ve you been with since the first word of the first draft and you’re waiting for those five star reviews to roll in. You’re super excited about it and you know it’s the greatest, and then the first one from you’re family comes in at agrees with you.
Then another, and another, and you’re on top of the world. Then the report from a beta reader and she loves it, but there’s a lot of things she didn’t like or didn’t agree with. Then another comes in saying she hated the first chapter and didn’t read past it. And now your critique partner’s come in and says it’s great, but this, this, and this need to change and don’t worry, it’s not that big of a change she’d like to see.
So, what’s your response? Do you a) yell at the ones who don’t think it’s great for their obvious stupidity for not seeing what a genius you are. After all, your mom likes it, why don’t they? b) You go run and hide in the corner to cry your eyes out and then give up. Or c) you pick and choose at the advice and use it to make a better version and submit yourself to another round of heart wrenching criticism.
Well, if you chose C then you win the chocolate cookie. Go on, you know you want it. I’ll wait here until you get it….Done? Great.
Yes, in an ideal world C would be the correct choice, but is it the one we do? Nope. Not even close. Most of the time it’s a combination of a and b and then, if we’re smart, we’ll move onto c pretty quickly.
So, why did the critiques vary so much? Well, the obvious choice is opinion. It all boils down to someone’s opinion. What they want to see. But it’s more complicated than that.
Take, for example, your friends and family’s critique. How much of what they told you was tainted by the fact that they knew you? That they were thinking the whole time they were reading it, that they’d have to live, or work with you after they told you what they thought? Probably a lot, right? You betcha. So, you know automatically that anything they’re going to say is going to be tinged on the side of they-don’t-want-to-hurt-your-feelings. So, anytime you read their reviews, remember to take it with a shaker full of salt.
So, why did one Beta totally love it and the other hate it. That’s probably personal opinion. Did you get beta readers that read in your genre? Or did you choose people at random? It’s usually better to get someone who reads in your genre, who knows all it’s intricacies and quirks. And who’s familiar with its voice. Otherwise, you’ll end up with a person who doesn’t like what you write and will stop reading after the first paragraph.
Now onto your critique partner, more than likely they’ve know you for a while and they know the story, at least in passing. So, they’ll be similar to your friends and family, but they also want to help you. In this case, it’s best to look at the criticism with an eye toward the truth. Did they really like your voice? Or were they just being friendly? Did they think you’re characters had depth? Or again, were they just being nice? Sometimes, even though you like your critique partner if you think they are becoming biased, it’s time to move on. You want someone who’s going to be honest with you, even if it hurts your feelings.
Even when you get lucky enough to get feedback from agents, you’ll see how much they’re opinions differ. Because, for the most part, it is there opinion. A lot of their job relies on their gut instinct. So, again, everyone’s feedback will differ. Take for instance me. The very first rejection I got, told me they really liked my story and I did a good job with isolating my MC from the rest of the world, but there wasn’t enough external conflict for him. Another told me I did a great job with characterization and it was well written, did a good job with conflict, but they just didn’t fall in love with it, and the latest one told me my characters were flat.
See how different they all are? And how they all contradict each other. Are any of them right? Or wrong? No. And Yes. It just depends on what you take from it and where they are coming from. The first agent doesn’t rep a lot of romance, so maybe the conflict wasn’t enough for him because of what he does rep. The second just didn’t feel it. It’s hard to qualify that, but would she have taken the time to tell me specific things about my manuscript, read the whole thing, and then lie about it? Doubtful. And the last, I’m not sure what this one was about. Since I’ve never had that particular feedback before from anyone. So, I’ve decided to go ahead and curb that critique until I hear something similar from other people. If/when I do, then I’ll have to go back and flesh them out. But until then, I’ll just pull out my ole salt shaker.
But did I get angry about them? One I did. Did I cry and want to quit? Sure, but I didn’t (well I did cry with one of those rejections, but I didn’t quit). Am I remembering the critiques to use if I revise the MSS? Darn tootin’. How else am I supposed to get better?
Now is any of these responses wrong? No, not really; unless you go and take it too far and for instance, start arguing with the person. Say I’d done that with the critique from agent three that I hadn’t agreed with. What do you think he’s going to do? Say, well I guess if other people didn’t feel that way, I won’t too. Why don’t you send it again so I can have another go? No, of course not. He’s going to delete the email, block my IP address and tell everyone in the industry what an idiot I was. Not something you want to happen if you want to be published.
You have to remember they’re entitled to their opinion. You may not like it and you don’t have to take it, but you can’t force them to change their mind. The best thing to do, if you really feel like they were wrong, is not ask them to critique it again, or not submit to them again. But, don’t take it out on them. It’s not cool and it isn’t going to help you.
If you feel like you absolutely need to vent, go talk with another writer friend who understands what you’re going through. If you’re of legal drinking age, go get a beer with friends, but please before you hit the send button on that nasty email, think how you’d feel if you’d taken the time to offer advice and someone told you, you were an idiot for not seeing it’s genius. You wouldn’t like it, and neither would they. Take a few deep breaths and then hit the button. The DELETE button.
Until next time, keep on truckin’ and go and buy yourself a giant salt shaker to douse those critiques with. You’ll need it.
Tomorrow’s post: The Writers’ Hate On For Agents and why we shouldn't
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Thursday, January 21, 2010
The Truth about Feedback
2010-01-21T08:24:00-05:00
J.A. Souders
agents|beta reads|critique partners|critiques|editors|Feedback|opinions|Publishing|salt|writing reviews|
Comments

Labels:
agents,
beta reads,
critique partners,
critiques,
editors,
Feedback,
opinions,
Publishing,
salt,
writing reviews
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
My Way or the Highway
As most of you know, I’m on Twitter, and lately I have found it to be an invaluable resource. Not just for getting my name out there, but also for learning things I never knew.
Yes, you heard me right. I actually learned something from Twitter. It isn’t just me wasting time as I hit writer’s block. You see, I follow several agents and not just because they’re considering my work or I want them to. Some of them don’t even rep. the type of work I write, or they have already rejected me. But I follow them because they give me an insider view of what’s going on in the world of agenting and publishing.
Which leads me to my posting today. A lot of them have been complaining lately of the queries they’ve been receiving, and it seemed so silly that they would be. I mean most people research the agents they’re querying, right? Most read the submission directions and only query one agent per query letter, right? They don’t get angry for responding too quickly or with a rejection, right?
Uh, no. No, they actually don’t.
And my question is why. Why would someone query twenty agents at once on the same letter? Why would someone submit an adult manuscript to an agent that states they only take children’s literature? Or send screenplays to an agent that only takes manuscripts?
Now I know none of you do this, so I’m probably preaching to the choir, but I thought I’d take time today to go over the importance of following the rules.
First and foremost, research the agents you want to query. Make sure they rep the genre that you write. And then follow their guidelines. Most agents’ websites clearly state what each particular agent is looking for and how they want you to submit. Some want just a query. Some want the query and the first five pages, or the query, a synopsis, and the first chapter, or some combination of the above. That’s why it’s important to follow their rules and not what you think they want.
If you can’t find their guidelines, and you’ve checked agent query, query tracker, and Publisher’s Marketplace and you still can’t find anything. Send a query and maybe the first five pages.
On that note, let's move onto attachments. Most agents don’t want them, so if they want the synopsis and the first 5 pages, copy and paste them into the letter. When in doubt, copy and paste. Don’t send an attachment. There’s no quicker way to an autoreject than submitting an attachment when they don’t want them.
The same goes for when they ask for a partial or full. Follow their guidelines. Make sure you know how they want it. If they want it electronic, make sure to check what format. After you do your snoopy dance, please, please, please give your manuscript one more glance. This is especially true if they want it snail mail. Sometimes your printer can screw up and you’d never know. So, make sure it’s perfect before you send it. And follow their guidelines. I can’t say this enough. When in doubt, ask.
Now onto the hard part: rejection. It’s going to happen. Even if you’ve done the research and think that the agent is a perfect match for your work, they may feel differently. The biggest thing is don’t email back to argue. Even if you’re MSS is perfectly written, and is the next Twilight and you’re sure of it, and you think they’re idiots for rejecting you, that’s their prerogative. Their choice.
They may not have connected with the mss like they wanted, or they already have a client that is writing something similar or—well there’s a million different reasons you might get the big R. Just take whatever information they give you and move on. Use it if you agree or other’s have said the same thing, or disregard it for later.
Please don’t be like the guy who bashes agents in his blog for reasons that escape me. Or the guy everyone refers to as “The query stalker” who sends the same query over and over to the same agents several times a week. This isn’t getting them anywhere and is in fact, making it harder 1) for the agents to their jobs and 2) for the rest of us that want to make it in this biz to get there.
On a closing note, if by any chance you are one of these people, please, please, please stop. You aren’t getting anywhere. You’ve become a joke. They don’t care. Yes, they talk about you, yes you’re getting people to your blog, but if I can be so blunt, you’re morons. Spend the time you’re taking pissing these people off and improve your writing. Take classes, send your mss to critiquing sites(see my Links page for some excellent sites), do something other than what you’re doing. It isn’t working.
Yes, you heard me right. I actually learned something from Twitter. It isn’t just me wasting time as I hit writer’s block. You see, I follow several agents and not just because they’re considering my work or I want them to. Some of them don’t even rep. the type of work I write, or they have already rejected me. But I follow them because they give me an insider view of what’s going on in the world of agenting and publishing.
Which leads me to my posting today. A lot of them have been complaining lately of the queries they’ve been receiving, and it seemed so silly that they would be. I mean most people research the agents they’re querying, right? Most read the submission directions and only query one agent per query letter, right? They don’t get angry for responding too quickly or with a rejection, right?
Uh, no. No, they actually don’t.
And my question is why. Why would someone query twenty agents at once on the same letter? Why would someone submit an adult manuscript to an agent that states they only take children’s literature? Or send screenplays to an agent that only takes manuscripts?
Now I know none of you do this, so I’m probably preaching to the choir, but I thought I’d take time today to go over the importance of following the rules.
First and foremost, research the agents you want to query. Make sure they rep the genre that you write. And then follow their guidelines. Most agents’ websites clearly state what each particular agent is looking for and how they want you to submit. Some want just a query. Some want the query and the first five pages, or the query, a synopsis, and the first chapter, or some combination of the above. That’s why it’s important to follow their rules and not what you think they want.
If you can’t find their guidelines, and you’ve checked agent query, query tracker, and Publisher’s Marketplace and you still can’t find anything. Send a query and maybe the first five pages.
On that note, let's move onto attachments. Most agents don’t want them, so if they want the synopsis and the first 5 pages, copy and paste them into the letter. When in doubt, copy and paste. Don’t send an attachment. There’s no quicker way to an autoreject than submitting an attachment when they don’t want them.
The same goes for when they ask for a partial or full. Follow their guidelines. Make sure you know how they want it. If they want it electronic, make sure to check what format. After you do your snoopy dance, please, please, please give your manuscript one more glance. This is especially true if they want it snail mail. Sometimes your printer can screw up and you’d never know. So, make sure it’s perfect before you send it. And follow their guidelines. I can’t say this enough. When in doubt, ask.
Now onto the hard part: rejection. It’s going to happen. Even if you’ve done the research and think that the agent is a perfect match for your work, they may feel differently. The biggest thing is don’t email back to argue. Even if you’re MSS is perfectly written, and is the next Twilight and you’re sure of it, and you think they’re idiots for rejecting you, that’s their prerogative. Their choice.
They may not have connected with the mss like they wanted, or they already have a client that is writing something similar or—well there’s a million different reasons you might get the big R. Just take whatever information they give you and move on. Use it if you agree or other’s have said the same thing, or disregard it for later.
Please don’t be like the guy who bashes agents in his blog for reasons that escape me. Or the guy everyone refers to as “The query stalker” who sends the same query over and over to the same agents several times a week. This isn’t getting them anywhere and is in fact, making it harder 1) for the agents to their jobs and 2) for the rest of us that want to make it in this biz to get there.
On a closing note, if by any chance you are one of these people, please, please, please stop. You aren’t getting anywhere. You’ve become a joke. They don’t care. Yes, they talk about you, yes you’re getting people to your blog, but if I can be so blunt, you’re morons. Spend the time you’re taking pissing these people off and improve your writing. Take classes, send your mss to critiquing sites(see my Links page for some excellent sites), do something other than what you’re doing. It isn’t working.
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
My Way or the Highway
2010-01-20T14:46:00-05:00
J.A. Souders
agent query|agents|critiquing sites|publisher's marketplace|Publishing|Query letters|query stalker|query tracker|querying|Rules|tips|twitter|
Comments

Labels:
agent query,
agents,
critiquing sites,
publisher's marketplace,
Publishing,
Query letters,
query stalker,
query tracker,
querying,
Rules,
tips,
twitter
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
What's the big deal with patience anyway?
Today’s topic is patience and stress relief, because as my good friends know, that is something I’m struggling with, especially in the last week.
Everyone always says “all good things come in time,” and it’s true. Patience is key, but what do you do when you don’t have any? I’m usually pretty good about at least burying my impatience, but this past week has been the hardest I’ve ever had to work to prevent myself from doing something stupid.
What am I stressing about and being impatient about? Well, my dream agent contacted me a week ago and wanted the full of my manuscript. I’m not going to say whom because I don’t want to curse it (yes I’m superstitious). I will say, however, that he’s from New York, he’s “young,” and he appears to have my sense of humor.
So, for the first time since I started querying, I’m in full panic mode. My thoughts are running the gambit from what if he doesn’t like it, to what if he does? I’m driving my husband crazy and the butterflies have taken permanent residence in my stomach. Along with the flying frogs.
I think they’re building a city in there. Complete with condos and subways.
So, I thought this would be the perfect time to talk about what I do to try and relieve some of the stress and the first thing that comes to mind is patience. Lots and lots of patience. Of course, that’s the one thing I’m usually short of.
Agents are busy people. They work long hours and then come home and work even longer. To be honest, besides the doctor I used to work for, I’m pretty sure agents are the busiest people I know.
Their first priority is their clients, so most of the manuscript and query reads are done on their own time. Which is why it is of the upmost importance to research your agents before you query them. I can’t stress this enough. Make sure that the agent you’re sending to is even, 1) Someone you think you can work with, 2) someone who represents—or wants to represent—what you’re writing, 3) is even taking unsolicited queries. Most of this stuff can be found on their webpage. So do yourself—and them—a favor and research before you send.
That being said, I know that he’ll read my manuscript in a timely manner and that he hasn’t forgotten me. I also know that my bugging him isn’t going to make him want to sign me. Which is obviously something I want. I have to let my manuscript speak for itself. Which, since I’ve done the steps I talked about in an earlier blog—edited it to within an inch of its life, sent it to beta readers, and edited again—I’m confident it’s ready enough for him.
So, I have to be patient as I wait for Mr. Dream Agent to read (and love) Mirror. In the meantime, I’ve taken to scouring the Internet for absolutely anything I can find on him. Unfortunately, there isn’t much. Although what I have stumbled across has been pure gold. Interviews! There is nothing (in my mind) that tells you more about someone than how they answer interviews. And there has been no exception here. True, I may find out something completely different if he wants to work with me, but as of this moment, I’m convinced we’d be a good team.
So now that I’ve run out of reading material about him, I’ve tried writing again. It isn’t working. Not really. So, I go and take a boiling hot bath. That usually calms me down for at least an hour and then I can get at least that hour’s worth of writing done.
If that doesn’t work, I go take a walk or a bike ride (isn’t Florida wonderful?) or try burying myself into one of the hundred books I have piled on my dresser, waiting for me to crack open it’s cover.
Which reminds me; don’t forget to visit my blog on Sundays where I’ll be doing my own informal book reviews. I’m even working on getting a published YA author as a guest blogger for January. If I’m really lucky, I might be able to persuade her to autograph one of her books for me and I’ll have a give-a-way. More details on that at another date, but you can only participate if you follow me on my blog at BlogSpot.
And now back to our regularly scheduled blog!
So what do you do when your patience runs out, your mind can’t focus on reading or writing, and you’ve taken your tenth bath that day? I’m still working on that. Maybe someone can help me out here. LOL.
Oh and if anyone is wondering why I have a picture of a dentist for today's post. It's because to me having waiting is akin to being at the dentist. I hate it!!
Posted by
J.A. Souders
at
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
What's the big deal with patience anyway?
2009-12-09T13:00:00-05:00
J.A. Souders
agents|patience|stress relief|writing|
Comments

Labels:
agents,
patience,
stress relief,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)