To see or post comments, click on the blog post title to be "in" the post.
I have a new blog! It's over at my new website. So make sure to go over there for new posts as this blog will be closing soon!

Monday, May 21, 2012

Monday Musings: Pet Peeves

Photo credit: http://www.thebookladysblog.com/



I've been judging a lot of contests lately and while I love doing it, I've noticed that lately a lot of entries are hitting my pet peeves pretty hard. Specifically one.

Character development/motivation.

I think on my latest grouping of entries, I marked every entry down for character development.  Even the entries I loved.  And it's not just contest entries I've seen it in, it's in published books, too!

It's not that the characters aren't developed enough (although sometimes it is), it's that the motivation isn't there or doesn't match what we've seen of the character.

For instance, when a character states that he can't go through a portal to a different world because it's forbidden and he's afraid of the person who would enforce it, but then walks straight through that portal without a second thought and considers bringing someone back with him because they asked him, too, without a thought to the consequences. There lacks a certain motivation.

Now, if he had a thought that EXPLAINED why he did all that, despite the consequences, I'd believe it more.  But without that thought, or an explanation of some sort, it makes the characters unreliable and lacks that development I was talking about.  And it really drives me to distraction.

 So QFU: What's your pet peeve?

Also, the winner of my Birthday Bash giveaway is:



Erin PreFontaine

Congrats, Erin!  You should have received an email from me this morning with instructions.

Thanks again, everyone, for entering. Stay tuned for more contests soon!

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
This! Character development can absolutely make or break a book for me. What's the point of investing in a book if you aren't invested in the characters?
1 reply · active 671 weeks ago
My pet peeve is when authors explain things outside of dialogue that is shown or should be shown in dialogue.
Example:
"You're just a little girl," my sister teased me. "And I'm the boss around here," she said snobbily.
We can tell the sister is teasing and that she is saying things snobbily just by the words. It's so frustrating when authors explained what's already there.
1 reply · active 671 weeks ago
Yes! Absolutely. Said and asked are perfect fine dialogue tags. And most of the time you don't even need that!

Post a new comment

Comments by